Disease Information
2 March 2006
Vol. 19 - No. 9Contents
NEWCASTLE DISEASE IN SWEDEN
Follow-up report No. 2 (final report) on the outbreak in Skåne CountySee also: 23 November 2006, 15 June 2006, 16 February 2006, 19 January 2006, 19 January 2006, 30 December 2005, 23 December 2005
Information received on 15 February 2006 from Dr Leif Denneberg, Chief Veterinary Officer, Swedish Board of Agriculture, Jönköping:
End of previous report period: 16 January 2006 (see Disease Information, 19 [3], 34, dated 19 January 2006).
End of this report period: 15 February 2006.
Precise identification of agent: paramyxovirus type 1 (intracerebral pathogenicity index: 1.58).
Date of first confirmation of the event: 28 December 2005.
Date of start of the event: 9 December 2005.
Details of outbreak (reminder):
First administrative division Type of epide-miolo-gical unit Name of the location Date of start of the outbreak Spe-cies Number of animals in the outbreak susceptible cases deaths destroyed slaugh-tered Skåne County farm Norra Skravling, Billeberga 9 Dec. 2005 avi* 18,900* 300 300 18,600 0 * Laying hens
Other details/comments:
All poultry in the infected holding were culled and destroyed on 12 December 2005.
Preliminary cleaning and disinfection was done on 15 December 2005. There was no further spread of the virus.
Transport restrictions in the 10-km-radius surveillance area were lifted as from 16 January 2006.
Final cleaning and disinfection were completed on 14 February 2006.
Final report: yes.
*
* *AVIAN INFLUENZA IN INDIA
Follow-up report No. 1See also: 17 August 2006, 8 June 2006, 16 March 2006, 23 February 2006
Information received on 23 February 2006 from Mr P.M.A. Hakeem, Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of Agriculture, Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairying, New Delhi:
End of the previous report period: 18 February 2006 (see Disease Information, 19 [8], 133, dated 23 February 2006).
End of this report period: 23 February 2006.
Identification of agent: highly pathogenic avian influenza virus subtype H5N1.
Date of first confirmation of the event: 18 February 2006.
Date of start of the event: 27 January 2006.
Clinical disease: yes.
Nature of diagnosis: post-mortem and laboratory.
Details of outbreak (reminder):
First administrative division (State) Lower administrative division (district) Type of epide-miolo-gical unit Name of the location Date of start of the outbreak Spe-cies Number of animals in the outbreaks susceptible cases deaths destroyed slaugh-tered Maharashtra Nandurbar village Navapur 27 Jan 2006 avi Description of affected population: poultry
Source of outbreaks or origin of infection: unknown or inconclusive.
Control measures undertaken:
- movement control inside the country;
- stamping out;
- disinfection of infected premises/establishment(s).
Due to the very small number of poultry in the infected and surveillance zones, we have resorted to stamping out in the entire 10-km radius infected zone. To date, no further cases of avian influenza have been reported from this area or from any other parts of the country.
Treatment of affected animals: no.
Final report: no.
*
* *HIGHLY PATHOGENIC AVIAN INFLUENZA IN TURKEY
Follow-up report No. 6See also: 17 August 2006, 18 May 2006, 11 May 2006, 27 April 2006, 20 April 2006, 13 April 2006, 6 April 2006, 30 March 2006, 23 March 2006, 9 March 2006, 2 March 2006, 23 February 2006, 2 February 2006, 26 January 2006, 19 January 2006, 12 January 2006, 30 December 2005, 9 December 2005, 18 November 2005, 28 October 2005, 14 October 2005, 14 October 2005
Information received on 23 February 2006 from Dr Hüseyin Sungur, Director General, General Directorate of Protection and Control, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Ankara:
End of previous report period: 17 February 2006 (see Disease Information, 19 [8], 129, dated 23 February 2006).
End of this report period: 23 February 2006.
Identification of agent: highly pathogenic avian influenza virus subtype H5N1.
Date of first confirmation of the event: 26 December 2005.
Date of start of the event: 15 December 2005.
Clinical disease: yes.
Nature of diagnosis: clinical and laboratory.
New outbreaks:
First administrative division Lower administrative division Type of epide-miolo-gical unit Name of the location Date of start of the outbreak Spe-cies Number of animals in the outbreaks susceptible cases deaths destroyed slaugh-tered Adana Yüregir village Duzce 15 Jan. 2006 avi 238 5 5 233 0 Bitlis Adilcevaz village Evrenpasa 2 Jan. 2006 avi 8,071 8,071 0 Malatya Merkez village Melekbaba 12 Jan. 2006 avi 152 2 2 150 0 Malatya Yazihan village Karaca 12 Jan. 2006 avi 352 1 1 351 0 Manisa Golmarmara village Kayaalti koyu 16 Feb. 2006 avi 1,121 8 8 1,113 0 Mus Bulanik village Bingoldek koyu 11 Jan. 2006 avi 213 1 1 212 0 Mus Bulanik village Merkez 9 Jan. 2006 avi 6,729 4 4 6,725 0 Mus Haskoy village Merkez 12 Jan. 2006 avi 2 2 0 Siirt Baykan village Kasimli koyu 11 Jan. 2006 avi 1 1 0 Siirt Baykan village Yarimca 11 Jan. 2006 avi 1 1 0 Siirt Baykan village Ziyaret Bel. 12 Jan. 2006 avi 4,319 1 1 4,318 0 Siirt Merkez village 9 Jan. 2006 avi 12,868 5 5 12,863 0 Siirt Pervari village Gulecler koyu 8 Jan. 2006 avi 9 9 0 Siirt Pervari village Palamutlu koyu 9 Jan. 2006 avi 1 1 0 Tunceli Merkez village Gulec koyu 13 Jan. 2006 avi 1 1 0 Tunceli Pertek village Ardic 12 Jan. 2006 avi 729 1 1 728 0 Affected population: backyard (village) poultry flocks.
Diagnosis:
Laboratory where diagnostic tests were performed Outbreak Species examined Diagnostic tests used Date Results Bornova Veterinary Control and Research Institute Yuregir/Adana chicken HI(1) 20 Feb. 2006 positive H5 Adilcevaz/Bitlis chicken HI 14 Feb. 2006 positive H5 Merkez/Malatya chicken HI 14 Feb. 2006 positive H5 Yazihan/Malatya chicken HI 14 Feb. 2006 positive H5 Golmarmara/Manisa chicken HI 17 Feb. 2006 positive H5 Haskoy/Mus chicken HI 14 Feb. 2006 positive H5 Bulanik-Merkez/Mus chicken HI 14 Feb. 2006 positive H5 Bulanik/Mus chicken HI 15 Feb. 2006 positive H5 Baykan-Yarimca/Siirt chicken HI 14 Feb. 2006 positive H5 Baykan/Siirt chicken HI 14 Feb. 2006 positive H5 Merkez/Siirt chicken HI 15 Feb. 2006 positive H5 Pervari/Siirt chicken HI 21 Feb. 2006 positive H5 Baykan-Kasimli/Siirt chicken HI 21 Feb. 2006 positive H5 Pervari-Palamutlu/Siirt chicken HI 21 Feb. 2006 positive H5 Merkez/Tunceli chicken HI 14 Feb. 2006 positive H5 Pertek/Tunceli chicken HI 14 Feb. 2006 positive H5 Origin of infection: contact with wild birds.
Control measures undertaken:
- stamping out;
- quarantine;
- movement control inside the country;
- screening;
- zoning;
- disinfection of infected premises/establishment(s).
Treatment of affected animals: no.
Vaccination prohibited: yes.
Other details/comments:
- Between 15 December 2005 and 23 February 2006, a total of 2,270,307 poultry were culled within and outside the outbreaks.
- A total of 29 outbreaks in 12 provinces have ended.
Final report: no.
(1) HI: haemagglutination inhibition test
*
* *HIGHLY PATHOGENIC AVIAN INFLUENZA IN TURKEY
Follow-up report No. 7See also: 17 August 2006, 18 May 2006, 11 May 2006, 27 April 2006, 20 April 2006, 13 April 2006, 6 April 2006, 30 March 2006, 23 March 2006, 9 March 2006, 2 March 2006, 23 February 2006, 2 February 2006, 26 January 2006, 19 January 2006, 12 January 2006, 30 December 2005, 9 December 2005, 18 November 2005, 28 October 2005, 14 October 2005, 14 October 2005
Information received on 1 March 2006 from Dr Hüseyin Sungur, Director General, General Directorate of Protection and Control, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Ankara:
End of previous report period: 23 February 2006 (see Disease Information, 19 [9], 159, dated 2 March 2006).
End of this report period: 1 March 2006.
Identification of agent: highly pathogenic avian influenza virus subtype H5N1.
Date of first confirmation of the event: 26 December 2005.
Date of start of the event: 15 December 2005.
Clinical disease: yes.
Nature of diagnosis: clinical, post-mortem and laboratory.
New outbreaks:
First administrative division Lower administrative division Type of epide-miolo-gical unit Name of the location Date of start of the outbreak Spe-cies Number of animals in the outbreaks susceptible cases deaths destroyed slaugh-tered Batman Kozluk village A.Yankili 11 Jan. 2006 avi 634 2 2 632 0 Kirklareli Demirkoy village Begendik 8 Feb. 2006 avi 377 25 25 352 0 Rize Cayeli village Madenli Yemisli 3 Feb. 2006 avi 64 1 1 63 0 Rize Merkez village Kucukcayir 2 Feb. 2006 avi 5 4 4 1 0 Rize Merkez village Caycilar 3 Feb. 2006 avi 974 2 2 972 0 S.Urfa Viransehir village Ucgul koyu 6 Feb. 2006 avi 1,473 304 304 1,169 0 Samsun 19 Mayis village Yorukler 3 Feb. 2006 avi 2,244 2 2 2,242 0 Samsun Alacam village Y.Elma koyu avi 0 Samsun Atakum village Çobarili mah. 6 Feb. 2006 avi 2,562 2 2 2,560 0 Samsun Bafra village Köseli 2 Feb. 2006 avi 5,952 3 3 5,949 0 Samsun Bafra village Surmeli avi 0 Samsun Bafra village Sarikoy avi 0 Samsun Carsamba village Durusu 2 Feb. 2006 avi 1,631 2 2 1,629 0 Samsun Carsamba village Kumtepe 3 Feb. 2006 avi 211 5 5 206 0 Samsun Kavak village Ilica avi 0 Samsun Merkez village Asarcik 5 Feb. 2006 avi 1 1 0 Samsun Merkez village Dereler 4 Feb. 2006 avi 3 3 0 Samsun Tekkeköy village Selyeri 31 Jan. 2006 avi 2,097 1 1 2,096 0 Samsun Tekkeköy village Asagicinik 31 Jan. 2006 avi 655 1 1 654 0 Samsun Tekkeköy village Buyuklu Beldesi 7 Feb. 2006 avi 250 1 1 249 0 Samsun Tekkeköy village Balcali 3 Feb. 2006 avi 261 1 1 260 0 Samsun Terme village Yenimahalle 2 Feb. 2006 avi 545 1 1 544 0 Samsun Terme village Cangallar 3 Feb. 2006 avi 1 1 0 Samsun Terme village Uzungazi 3 Feb. 2006 avi 1 1 0 Samsun Terme village Karacali 3 Feb. 2006 avi 1 1 0 Samsun Terme village Golyazi 6 Feb. 2006 avi 127 2 2 125 0 Samsun Vezirköpru village Tepeoren 4 Feb. 2006 avi 1,497 2 2 1,495 0 Sinop Boyabat village Kozkule 2 Feb. 2006 avi 210 1 1 209 0 Sinop Merkez village Bektasaga Koyu 8 Feb. 2006 avi 918 5 5 913 0 Sinop Türkeli village Duz koyu 7 Feb. 2006 avi 453 1 1 452 0 Sirnak Silopi village Ozge koyu 2 Feb. 2006 avi 332 1 1 331 0 Tokat Niksar village Merkez 9 Jan. 2006 avi 1 1 0 Tokat Niksar village Cimenozu Koyu 6 Jan. 2006 avi 978 1 1 977 0 Tokat Yesilyurt village Merkez 23 Jan. 2006 avi 3,209 1 1 3,208 0 Tokat Zile village Sogutozu koyu 8 Feb. 2006 avi 1 1 0 Affected population: backyard (village) poultry flocks.
Diagnosis:
Laboratories where diagnostic tests were performed Outbreak Species examined Diagnostic tests used Date Results Bornova Veterinary Control and Research Institute Yankili/Batman chicken HI(1) 26 Jan. 2006 positive H5 Turkeli/Sinop chicken HI 23 Feb. 2006 positive H5 Central Veterinary Control and Research Institute, Ankara 19 Mayis/Samsun chicken HI 23 Feb. 2006 positive H5 Alacam/Samsun chicken HI 23 Feb. 2006 positive H5 Asarcik/Samsun chicken HI 23 Feb. 2006 positive H5 Atakum/Samsun chicken HI 23 Feb. 2006 positive H5 Bafra/Samsun chicken HI 23 Feb. 2006 positive H5 Bafra-Sarikoy/Samsun chicken HI 23 Feb. 2006 positive H5 Bafra-Surmeli/Samsun chicken HI 23 Feb. 2006 positive H5 Boyabat/Sinop chicken HI 23 Feb. 2006 positive H5 Carsamba/Samsun chicken HI 23 Feb. 2006 positive H5 Caycilar/Rize chicken HI 23 Feb. 2006 positive H5 Cayeli/Rize chicken HI 23 Feb. 2006 positive H5 Kava- Ilica/Samsun chicken HI 23 Feb. 2006 positive H5 Kucukcayir/Rize chicken HI 23 Feb. 2006 positive H5 Merkez/Sinop chicken, turkey HI 16 Feb. 2006 positive H5 Merkez-Dereler/Samsun chicken HI 23 Feb. 2006 positive H5 Niksar/Tokat chicken HI 26 Jan. 2006 positive H5 Niksar-Cimenozu/Tokat chicken HI 10 Feb. 2006 positive H5 Silopi/Sirnak chichen HI 16 Feb. 2006 positive H5 Tekkekoy/Samsun chicken HI 23 Feb. 2006 positive H5 Tekkekoy/Samsun chicken HI 23 Feb. 2006 positive H5 Tekkekoy-Balcali/Samsun chicken HI 23 Feb. 2006 positive H5 Terme/Samsun chicken HI 23 Feb. 2006 positive H5 Terme-Cangallar/Samsun chicken HI 23 Feb. 2006 positive H5 Terme-Golyazi/Samsun chicken HI 23 Feb. 2006 positive H5 Terme-Karacali/Samsun chicken HI 23 Feb. 2006 positive H5 Terme-Uzungazi/Samsun chicken HI 23 Feb. 2006 positive H5 Vezirkopru/Samsun chicken HI 23 Feb. 2006 positive H5 Yesilyurt/Tokat chicken HI 9 Feb. 2006 positive H5 Zile/Tokat chicken HI 9 Feb. 2006 positive H5 Pendik Veterinary Control and Research Institute Kirklareli chicken HI 10 Feb. 2006 positive RT-PCR(2) 10 Feb. 2006 positive N1 Viransehir-Ucgul/S.Urfa chicken HI 16 Feb. 2006 positive H5 Origin of infection: contact with wild birds.
Control measures undertaken:
- stamping out;
- quarantine;
- movement control inside the country;
- screening;
- zoning;
- disinfection of infected premises/establishment(s).
Treatment of affected animals: no.
Vaccination prohibited: yes.
Other details/comments:
- In addition, H5 virus was detected in a dove and a pigeon in Amasya province, in a swan, a hawk, a pigeon and a sparrow in Samsun province and in a swan in Sinop province.
- Between 15 December 2005 and 1 March 2006, a total of 2,277,220 poultry were culled within and outside the outbreaks.
- A total of 39 outbreaks in 16 provinces have ended.
Final report: no.
(1) HI: haemagglutination inhibition test
(2) RT-PCR: reverse transcriptase - polymerase chain reaction
*
* *AVIAN INFLUENZA IN MALAYSIA
See also: 22 June 2006, 30 March 2006, 9 March 2006
(Date of previous outbreak of avian influenza in Malaysia reported to the OIE: 3 January 2005).
Immediate notification report
Information received on 23 February 2006 from Dr Hawari Bin Hussein, Director General, Department of Veterinary Service, Ministry of Agriculture, Kuala Lumpur:
Report date: 23 February 2006.
Reason for immediate notification: re-occurrence of a listed disease or infection in a country, zone/compartment following a report declaring the outbreak(s) ended.
Identification of agent: highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1.
Date of first confirmation of the event: 19 February 2006.
Date of start of the event: 6 February 2006.
Clinical disease: yes.
Nature of diagnosis: laboratory.
Details of outbreak:
First administrative division (state) Lower administra-tive division (city) Type of epide-miolo-gical unit Name of the location (village) Latitude Longitude Date of start of the outbreak Spe-cies Number of animals in the outbreak suscep-tible cases deaths des-troyed slaugh-tered Wilayah Persekutuan Setapak village Pasir Wardieburn 03Ί 11.563 N 101Ί 43.023 E 6 Feb.2006 avi 150 50 50 100 0 Description of affected population: free range village chickens.
Diagnosis:
Laboratories where diagnostic tests were performed Species examined Diagnostic tests used Date Results Regional Veterinary Laboratory, Petaling Jaya avi - virus isolation;
- RT-PCR
18 Feb. 2006 Positive for H5 Veterinary Research Institute avi - RT-PCR (M gene);
- RT-PCR (H5 gene);
- RT-PCR (N1 gene).
19 Feb. 2006 Positive for H5N1 Source of outbreak or origin of infection: unknown or inconclusive.
Control measures undertaken:
- stamping out;
- quarantine;
- movement control inside the country;
- screening;
- zoning;
- disinfection of infected premises/establishment(s);
- dipping/spraying.
Treatment of affected animals: no.
Vaccination prohibited: yes.
Other details/comments:
A 1-km-radius Infected Zone was established around the index case. Culling in the infected Zone started on 20 February 2006 and was completed on 22 February 2006 (1,970 chickens, 62 ducks and 72 other birds). In addition, 505 eggs were also destroyed
A 10-km-radius Surveillance Zone was also established. Clinical and laboratory surveillance is underway in the Surveillance Zone. Surveillance is also underway in other States.
Final report: no.
*
* *FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE IN TURKEY
in Thrace region (Follow-up report No. 1)See also: 5 October 2006, 13 July 2006, 22 June 2006, 6 April 2006, 23 March 2006, 9 February 2006
Information received on 23 February and 1 March 2006 from Dr Hüseyin Sungur, Director General, General Directorate of Protection and Control, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Ankara:
End of previous report period: 7 February 2006 (see Disease Information, 19 [6], 91, dated 9 February 2006).
End of this report period: 23 February 2006.
Precise identification of agent: foot and mouth disease (FMD) virus type A.
Date of first confirmation of the event: 1 February 2006.
Date of start of the event: 21 January 2006.
Clinical disease: yes.
Nature of diagnosis: clinical and laboratory.
New outbreaks:
First administrative division Lower administrative division Type of epide-miolo-gical unit Name of the location Date of start of the outbreak Spe-cies Number of animals in the outbreaks susceptible cases deaths destroyed slaugh-tered Kirklareli Merkez village Kavakdere 6 Feb. 2006 bov 539 17 0 0 17 ovi 1,025 0 0 0 0 Kirklareli Merkez village Urunlu 11 Feb. 2006 bov 820 3 0 0 3 ovi 400 0 0 0 0 Kirklareli Merkez village Kayali 11 Feb. 2006 bov 2,120 17 0 0 17 ovi 5,070 0 0 0 0 cap 1,265 0 0 0 0 Kirklareli Luleburgaz village Seyitler 1 Feb. 2006 bov 125 14 0 0 0 ovi 290 0 0 0 0 Kirklareli Luleburgaz village Karamusul 30 Jan. 2006 bov 676 3 0 0 0 ovi 762 0 0 0 0 Kirklareli Demirkoy village Avcilar 6 Feb. 2006 bov 46 4 0 0 0 Tekirdag Marmaraereglisi village Y.Ciftlik 11 Feb. 2006 bov 670 3 0 0 0 Tekirdag Vakifidemir village 10 Feb. 2006 bov 554 8 0 0 0 Tekirdag Merkez village Cinarli 20 Feb. 2006 bov 51 3 0 0 0 Tekirdag Merkez village Kasikci 24 Feb. 2006 bov 442 1 0 0 0 ovi 584 0 0 0 0 Tekirdag Merkez village Tasomurca 28 Feb. 2006 bov 132 1 0 0 0 Edirne Uzunkopru village Kirkkavak 26 Feb. 2006 bov 26 15 0 0 0 Diagnosis:
Location of outbreaks Species examined Diagnostic tests used Date Results Merkez-Urunlu in Kirklareli bov ELISA 15 Feb. 2006 Type A Merkez-Kayali in Kirklareli bov ELISA 15 Feb. 2006 Type A Luleburgaz-Seyitler in Kirklareli bov ELISA 8 Feb. 2006 Type A Luleburgaz-Karamusul in Kirklareli bov ELISA 7 Feb. 2006 Type A Merkez-Kavakdere in Kirklareli bov ELISA 13 Feb. 2006 Type A Demirkoy-Avcilar in Kirklareli bov ELISA 13 Feb. 2006 Type A Marmaraereglisi in Tekirdag bov ELISA 12 Feb. 2006 Type A Malkara-Vakifidemir in Tekirdag bov ELISA 15 Feb. 2006 Type A Merkez-Cinarli in Tekirdag bov ELISA 27 Feb. 2006 Type A Source of outbreaks or origin of infection: introduction of new animals/animal products, legal movement of animals.
Control measures undertaken:
- quarantine;
- movement control inside the country;
- screening;
- zoning;
- vaccination;
- disinfection of infected premises/establishment(s).
Vaccination in response to the outbreaks:
First administrative division Species Total number of animals vaccinated Details of the vaccine Kirklareli/Kavakdere bov 521 trivalent* Kirklareli/Urunlu bov 752 trivalent Kirklareli/Kayali bov 1,825 trivalent ovi 5,070 trivalent cap 1,265 trivalent Kirklareli/Seyitler bov 90 trivalent Kirklareli/Karamusul bov 667 trivalent Tekirdag/Marmaraereglisi bov 670 trivalent ovi 600 trivalent Tekirdag/Vakifidemir bov 3,237 trivalent ovi 448 trivalent Merkez/Kasikci bov 439 trivalent ovi 523 trivalent Merkez/Tasomurka bov 118 trivalent Edirne/Uzunkopru bov 2,223 trivalent * Trivalent: A, O, Asia 1.
Vaccination prohibited: no.
Other details/comments:
The disease had not been seen in Thrace region since June 2001. No FMD type A outbreaks were detected in Turkey between the beginning of June 2005 and November 2005. Following the detection of one outbreak due to type A in the Eastern province of Elazig in November and 13 further outbreaks in December, detailed investigations were initiated. Laboratory analysis showed that these type A viruses were genetically quite distinct from A Iran 96 and A Iran 99 virus topotypes, both of which have recently been circulating in Turkey. The sequence data which was obtained at the Ankara SAP Institute was sent to the OIE/FAO Reference Laboratory in Pirbright, United Kingdom, and these viruses were found to be closely matched with viruses isolated in Iran in 2005. The antigenic relationship of these viruses with A Iran 96 and A Iran 99 vaccine strains was very weak. These findings by the OIE Reference Laboratory in Pirbright were also confirmed by the SAP Institute and the A 22 Mahmatli vaccine strain was determined as the most effective vaccine strain against these new viruses.
Viruses recently isolated from Thrace were also sequenced and found to be the same as new viruses recently isolated from Anatolia.
Studies were immediately initiated with a view to producing a vaccine against A 22 Mahmatli. Distribution of the new trivalent vaccine, which includes A 22 Mahmatli, O Manisa and Asia 1 viruses, was started on 10 February 2006.
In addition to the above-mentioned vaccinations, 6,291 bovine animals and 1,300 sheep were vaccinated in the outbreak in Malkara/Tekirdag and 750 bovine animals were vaccinated in the outbreak in Nadirli (Babaeski, Kirklareli province).
Within the framework of the spring vaccination campaigns, 59,865 bovine animals have been vaccinated in Kirklareli province.
Final report: no.
*
* *HIGHLY PATHOGENIC AVIAN INFLUENZA IN ROMANIA
Follow-up report No. 19See also: 23 February 2006, 16 February 2006, 19 January 2006, 5 January 2006, 30 December 2005, 23 December 2005, 16 December 2005, 9 December 2005, 2 December 2005, 2 December 2005, 25 November 2005, 18 November 2005, 4 November 2005, 4 November 2005, 28 October 2005, 21 October 2005, 21 October 2005, 14 October 2005, 14 October 2005
Information received on 24 February 2006 from Dr Gabriel Predoi, Director General, National Sanitary Veterinary and Food Safety Authority, Bucharest:
End of previous report period: 22 February 2006 (see Disease Information, 19 [8], 138, dated 23 February 2006).
End of this report period: 17 February 2006.
Identification of agent: highly pathogenic avian influenza virus subtype H5N1.
Date of first confirmation of the event: 7 October 2005.
Date of start of the event: October 2005.
Nature of diagnosis: suspicion, clinical and laboratory.
New outbreaks:
First administrative division (county) Lower administrative division (district) Name of the location (village) Date of start of the outbreak Spe-cies Number of animals in the outbreaks susceptible cases deaths destroyed slaugh-tered Constanta Tuzla Tuzla 16 Feb. 2006 avi 37 37 19 18 Constanta Navodari Navodari 16 Feb. 2006 avi 72 72 37 35 Description of affected population:
- Outbreak in Tuzla: backyard premises with 30 hens and 7 geese.
- Outbreak in Navodari: backyard premises with 71 hens and 1 pheasant.
Diagnosis:
Laboratories where diagnostic tests were performed Species examined Diagnostic tests used Date Results Sanitary Veterinary Laboratory Constanta hens - rapid detection test;
- ELISA;
- RT-PCR.
16 Feb. 2006 Positive Source of outbreaks: contact with infected animal(s) at grazing/watering; contact with wild animals.
Control measures
A. Undertaken:
- stamping out;
- quarantine;
- movement control inside the country;
- screening;
- zoning;
- disinfection of infected premises/establishments.
B. To be undertaken:
- control of wildlife reservoirs.
Treatment of affected animals: no.
Vaccination prohibited: no.
Other details/comments:
We are awaiting confirmation of the two outbreaks from the Institute for Diagnostics and Animal Health (national reference laboratory) before applying control measures.
Final report: no.
*
* *FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE IN ARGENTINA
Follow-up report No. 1See also: 13 April 2006, 2 March 2006, 9 February 2006
Translation of information received on 24 February 2006 from Dr Jorge Nestor Amaya, President, National Agrifood Health and Quality Service (SENASA(1)), Secretariat for Agriculture, Livestock, Fisheries and Food, Buenos Aires:
End of previous report period: 8 February 2006 (see Disease Information, 19 [6], 96, dated 9 February 2006).
End of this report period: 23 February 2006.
Identification of agent: foot and mouth disease (FMD) virus serotype O.
Date of first confirmation of the event: 8 February 2006.
Date of start of the event: 5 February 2006*.
Clinical disease: yes.
Nature of diagnosis: clinical and laboratory.
Details of outbreak (reminder):
First administrative division (province) Lower administrative division Type of epide-miolo-gical unit Latitude Longitude Date of start of the outbreak Spe-cies Number of animals in the outbreak susceptible cases deaths destroyed slaugh-tered Corrientes San Luis del Palmar farm 27Ί 30' 24.2" S 58Ί 22' 59.6" W 5 Feb. 2006* bov 4,098 70 0 4,098 0 ovi 100 0 0 100 0 cap 235 0 0 235 0 sui 5 0 0 5 0 * Date of the official intervention after notification was received. Judging by observations at the farm (lesions and clinical signs) and by the preliminary investigations, the event probably started on 26 January 2006.
Source of outbreak or origin of infection: unknown or inconclusive.
Stamping out:
Stamping-out of all the sick animals and contacts was completed on 19 February 2006, totalling 4,098 cattle, 100 sheep, 235 goats and 5 pigs. Contacts have been considered as all animals in the establishment (these animals belong to different owners but are considered to be part of the same epidemiological unit), as well as animals from a neighbouring establishment linked with this establishment, owing to the fact that the owner is the manager of the affected establishment.
A proximity risk assessment is being carried out in the field, with other establishments adjoining the affected farm being considered as potential contacts, in order to determine the scope of the stamping-out policy.
Vaccination in response to the outbreak:
The vaccination of all animals in the perifocal area was completed on 18 February 2006.
The vaccination of the cattle in the surveillance area is still underway, in accordance with the schedule, and is due to be completed in 15 days time.
Final report: no.
(1) SENASA: Servicio Nacional de Sanidad y Calidad Agroalimentaria
*
* *FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE IN ARGENTINA
Follow-up report No. 2See also: 13 April 2006, 2 March 2006, 9 February 2006
Translation of information received on 24 and 27 February 2006 from Dr Jorge Nestor Amaya, President, National Agrifood Health and Quality Service (SENASA(1)), Secretariat for Agriculture, Livestock, Fisheries and Food, Buenos Aires:
End of previous report period: 8 February 2006 (see Disease Information, 19 [9], 169, dated 2 March 2006).
End of this report period: 27 February 2006.
Identification of agent: foot and mouth disease (FMD) virus serotype O.
Date of first confirmation of the event: 8 February 2006.
Date of start of the event: 5 February 2006.
Clinical disease: yes.
Nature of diagnosis: clinical and laboratory.
New outbreak:
First administrative division (province) Lower administrative division Type of epide-miolo-gical unit Latitude Longitude Date of start of the outbreak Spe-cies Number of animals in the outbreak susceptible cases deaths destroyed slaugh-tered Corrientes San Luis del Palmar farm 27Ί 30' 24.2" S 58Ί 22' 59.6" W 14 Feb. 2006 bov approx. 1,400 1 0 0 Affected population in the new outbreak:
The sick animal is a male bovine of between one and two years of age, with foot and mouth lesions for approximately the past seven days.
The producer owns a total of 16 cattle and shares the establishment with other producers. The production unit (epidemiological unit) involves approximately 50 producers, with a total population of around 1,400 cattle. The establishment adjoins the primary outbreak and is located within the perifocal area.
Diagnosis:
Laboratory where diagnostic tests were performed Species examined Diagnostic tests used Date Results SENASA Directorate of Laboratories and Technical Control (DILACOT(2)), Martínez, province of Buenos Aires bov probang test (using oesophageal-pharyngeal fluid) pending pending - ELISA(3) 3ABC;
- EITB(4);
- detection of antibodies against non structural proteins (from sera).
24 Feb. 2006 positive Source of new outbreak: unknown or inconclusive.
Control measures undertaken:
- stamping out (in progress);
- quarantine;
- movement control inside the country;
- screening;
- zoning;
- vaccination;
- disinfection of infected premises/establishment;
- dipping/spraying.
Vaccination in response to the outbreaks:
First administrative division Species Total number of animals vaccinated Details of the vaccine province of Corrientes bov 46,904 inactivated oil vaccine (polyvalent - serotypes O, A and C) o/c 1,887 inactivated oil vaccine (polyvalent - serotypes O, A and C) sui 63 inactivated oil vaccine (polyvalent - serotypes O, A and C) Treatment of affected animals: no.
Final report: no.
(1) SENASA: Servicio Nacional de Sanidad y Calidad Agroalimentaria
(2) DILACOT: Dirección de Laboratorios y Control Técnico
(3) ELISA: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
(4) EITB: electroimmunotransfer blot
*
* *AMERICAN FOULBROOD IN CHILE
Follow-up report No. 10See also: 30 March 2006, 26 January 2006, 12 January 2006, 23 December 2005, 16 December 2005, 9 December 2005, 2 December 2005, 25 November 2005, 18 November 2005, 4 November 2005, 28 October 2005
Translation of information received on 24 February 2006 from Dr Hernan Rojas Olavarria, Head, Division of Animal Protection, Livestock and Agriculture Service (SAG), Ministry of Agriculture, Santiago:
End of previous report period: 20 January 2006 (see Disease Information, 19 [4], 62, dated 26 January 2006).
End of this report period: 24 February 2006.
Identification of agent: Paenibacillus larvae subsp. larvae.
Date of first confirmation of the event: 20 October 2005.
Date of start of the event: 15 October 2005.
Nature of diagnosis: clinical and laboratory.
New outbreaks:
First adminis-trative division Lower adminis-trative division Type of epide-miologi-cal unit Name of the location Latitude Longitude Date of start of the outbreak Spe-cies Number of animals* in the outbreaks suscep-tible cases destroyed X Region Fresia apiary Llanquihue 41Ί 13' 25.1693" S 73Ί 23'33.8019 W 5 Jan. 2006 api 35 2 2 X Region Valdivia apiary Valdivia 39Ί 49' 59.1148 S 73Ί 23' 33.9978 W 14 Jan. 2006 api 22 1 1 X Region Puerto Varas apiary Llanquihue 41Ί 22' 17.6538 S 72Ί 42' 37.5122 W 17 Jan. 2006 api 4 2 2 X Region Puerto Varas apiary Llanquihue 41Ί 16' 44.0702 S 72Ί 47' 5.3095 W 17 Jan. 2006 api 13 3 3 X Region Cochamo apiary Llanquihue 41Ί 28' 54.9696 S 72Ί 19' 47.0819 W 10 Jan. 2006 api 150 6 6 X Region Cochamo apiary Llanquihue 41Ί 21' 24.7008 S 72Ί 16' 42.0302 W 17 Jan. 2006 api 150 3 3 X Region Puerto Montt apiary Llanquihue 41Ί 36' 3.01863 S 73Ί 4' 35.1885 W 19 Jan. 2006 api 11 5 5 * hives
Diagnosis:
Laboratory where diagnostic tests were performed Diagnostic tests used Date Results Department of Laboratories and Plant and Animal Quarantine Stations, Lo Aguirre, Santiago de Chile (official SAG laboratory) PCR (polymerase chain reaction) 17 and 26 Jan. 2006 positive Source of new outbreaks: contact with affected hives.
Control measures undertaken:
- quarantine;
- modified stamping out policy applied to affected apiaries in X Region;
- movement control inside the country;
- zoning.
Final report: no.
*
* *AVIAN INFLUENZA IN FRANCE
See also: 22 June 2006, 30 March 2006
Immediate notification report
Translation of information received on 25 February 2006 from Dr Monique Eloit, Deputy Director General, General Directorate for Food (DGAL), Ministry of Agriculture, Food, Fisheries and Rural Affairs, Paris:
Report date: 25 February 2006.
Reason for immediate notification: re-occurrence of a listed disease or infection in a country or zone/compartment following a report declaring the outbreak(s) ended.
Identification of agent: highly pathogenic avian influenza virus subtype H5N1.
Date of first confirmation of the event: 25 February 2006.
Date of start of the event: 23 February 2006.
Clinical disease: yes.
Nature of diagnosis: clinical and laboratory.
Details of outbreak:
First administrative division (department) Lower administrative division (district) Type of epide-miolo-gical unit Name of the location Date of start of the outbreak Spe-cies Number of animals in the outbreak susceptible cases deaths destroyed slaugh-tered Ain Versailleux farm Versailleux 23 Feb. 2006 avi 11,700 10,500 400 11,300 0 Description of affected population: 56-day-old turkeys in a commercial farm.
Diagnosis:
Laboratory where diagnostic tests were performed Species examined Diagnostic tests used Date Results AFSSA, Ploufragan (national reference laboratory) turkey RT-PCR 23 Feb. 2006 positive for H5 turkey RNA sequencing on tracheal swabs 25 Feb. 2006 positive for H5N1* * All 279 nucleotide positions that have been analysed reveal a 99.3% nucleotide sequence homology with the isolate A/BarHeadedGoose/Qinghai/65/05 (virus subtype H5N1) as well as with the virus detected in a pochard (Aythya ferina) on 17 February 2006 in Joyeux district, 1 km from the turkey farm.
Source of outbreak or origin of infection: unknown or inconclusive.
Control measures undertaken:
- control of wildlife reservoirs;
- stamping out (culling of all the remaining poultry in the affected farm was carried out on the afternoon of 23 February 2006);
- quarantine;
- movement control inside the country;
- screening;
- zoning (protection and surveillance zones were delineated around the farm as soon as the disease was suspected, i.e. on 23 February 2006);
- disinfection of infected premises;
- dipping/spraying.
Vaccination prohibited: yes.
Other details/comments:
Clinical signs appeared suddenly, with a very high morbidity rate and a high mortality rate.
Final report: no.
*
* *AVIAN INFLUENZA IN AZERBAIJAN
See also: 13 April 2006, 30 March 2006
Immediate notification report
Translation of information received on 27 February and 1 March 2006 from Dr Ismayil Murshud Gasanov, Head, State Veterinary Service, Ministry of Agriculture, Baku:
Report date: 24 February 2006.
Reason for immediate notification: first occurrence of a listed disease or infection in a country or zone/compartment.
Identification of agent: highly pathogenic avian influenza virus subtype H5N1.
Date of first confirmation of the event: 24 February 2006.
Date of start of the event: 22 February 2006.
Clinical disease: yes.
Nature of diagnosis: clinical and laboratory.
Details of outbreaks:
First administrative division Lower administrative division Type of epide-miolo-gical unit Date of start of the outbreak Spe-cies Number of animals in the outbreaks susceptible cases deaths destroyed slaugh-tered Khyzy Ghiljazi 22 Feb. 2006 avi 260,000 Biljasuvar Samedabad 22 Feb. 2006 avi 36,000 Diagnosis:
Laboratory where diagnostic tests were performed Animals examined Diagnostic test used Date Results State Veterinary Laboratory, Baku poultry virological testing 24-28 Feb. 2006 positive Source of outbreaks or origin of infection: unknown or inconclusive.
Control measures undertaken:
- control of wildlife reservoirs;
- quarantine;
- movement control inside the country;
- screening;
- disinfection of infected premises/establishments.
Final report: no.
*
* *AVIAN INFLUENZA IN NIGER
See also: 22 June 2006, 8 June 2006
(Date of previous outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza in Niger reported to the OIE: October 1995).
Immediate notification report
Translation of information received on 28 February 2006 from Dr Seini Aboubacar, Director for Animal Health, Ministry of Animal Resources, Niamey:
Report date: 28 February 2006.
Reason for immediate notification: re-occurrence of a listed disease or infection in a country or zone/compartment following a report declaring the outbreak(s) ended.
Identification of agent: highly pathogenic avian influenza virus subtype H5N1.
Date of first confirmation of the event: 27 February 2006.
Date of start of the event: 13 February 2006.
Clinical disease: yes.
Nature of diagnosis: clinical, post-mortem and laboratory.
Details of outbreak:
First administrative division (region) Lower administrative division (district) Type of epide-miolo-gical unit Date of start of the outbreak Spe-cies Number of animals in the outbreak susceptible cases deaths destroyed slaugh-tered Zinder Magaria village 13 Feb. 2006 avi approx. 20,000 Description of affected population: traditionally reared poultry (all breeds).
Diagnosis:
Laboratory where diagnostic tests were performed Species examined Diagnostic tests used Date Results OIE Reference Laboratory for avian influenza and Newcastle disease, Padova, Italy ducks RT-PCR 27 Feb. 2006 positive for H5N1 Source of outbreak or origin of infection: possible introduction of infected poultry from Nigeria.
Control measures
A. Undertaken:
- stamping out;
- quarantine;
- movement control inside the country;
- screening;
- zoning;
- disinfection of infected premises/establishments.
B. To be undertaken:
- vaccination.
Treatment of affected animals: no.
Other details/comments:
Magaria district is situated 1,000 km from Niamey. It is adjacent to the border with the State of Kano, in Nigeria, where the presence of the virus H5N1 was confirmed on 7 February 2006.
Since confirmation of the outbreak in Nigeria, the government of Niger has been carrying out a vast awareness campaign in all regions of the country.
All the relevant sanitary measures are currently being implemented, with the help of the country's development partners (FAO(1), WHO(2), AU-IBAR(3), OIE).
An Interministerial Committee on avian influenza control has been in place since October 2005.
A 12-month contingency plan has been prepared and has been submitted to the development partners.
(1) FAO: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
(2) WHO: World Health Organization
(3) AU-IBAR: African Union - Interafrican Bureau for Animal Resources
*
* *MISCELLANEOUS: AVIAN INFLUENZA IN FRANCE (IN WILDLIFE) (Follow-up report No. 1)
See also: 1 June 2006, 4 May 2006, 6 April 2006, 16 March 2006, 9 March 2006, 23 February 2006
Translation of information received on 23 February 2006 from Dr Monique Eloit, Deputy Director General, General Directorate for Food (DGAL), Ministry of Agriculture, Food, Fisheries and Rural Affairs, Paris:
End of previous report period: 20 February 2006 (see Disease Information, 19 [8], 149, dated 23 February 2006).
End of this report period: 23 February 2006.
Identification of agent: highly pathogenic avian influenza virus subtype H5N1.
Date of first confirmation of the event: 17 February 2006.
Date of start of the event: 13 February 2006.
New outbreak:
First administrative division (department) Lower administrative division (district) Type of epide-miolo-gical unit Date of start of the outbreak Spe-cies Number of animals in the outbreak susceptible cases deaths destroyed slaugh-tered Ain NA* fau 1 * NA: not applicable
Affected population: wild duck.
*
* *MISCELLANEOUS: AVIAN INFLUENZA IN GREECE (IN WILDLIFE) (Follow-up report No. 3)
See also: 24 August 2006, 30 March 2006, 23 February 2006, 16 February 2006, 16 February 2006
Information received on 23 and 24 February 2006 from Dr Vasilios Stylas, Head, Animal Health Directorate, Ministry of Agriculture, Athens:
End of previous report period: 22 February 2006 (see Disease Information, 19 [8], 152, dated 23 February 2006).
End of this report period: 24 February 2006.
Identification of agent: highly pathogenic avian influenza virus subtype H5N1.
Date of first confirmation of the event: 9 February 2006
Date of start of the event: 30 January 2006
Clinical disease: yes.
Nature of diagnosis: laboratory.
New outbreaks:
First administrative division (region) Lower administrative division (prefecture) Type of epide-miolo-gical unit Name of the location Latitude Longitude Date of start of the outbreak Spe-cies Number of animals in the outbreaks susceptible cases deaths destroyed slaugh-tered Central Macedonia Chalkidiki NA* Alykes, Amoliani Island 40Ί 20' N 23Ί 54' E 14 Feb. 2006 fau 2 2 2 0 0 Central Macedonia Pella NA* Loudias River, village of Nea Pella 40Ί 43' N 22Ί 28' E 13 Feb. 2006 fau 1 1 1 0 0 Central Macedonia Pieria NA* village of Makrygialos 40Ί 25' N 22Ί 36' E 11 Feb. 2006 fau 1 1 1 0 0 Central Macedonia Pieria NA* village of Paralia-Katerini 40Ί 16' N 22Ί 35' E 11 Feb. 2006 fau 1 1 1 0 0 Central Macedonia Thessaloniki NA* village of Epanomi 40Ί 25' N 22Ί 54' E 13 Feb. 2006 fau 1 1 1 0 0 Central Macedonia Thessaloniki NA* village of Stavros 40Ί 40' N 25Ί 41' E 12 Feb. 2006 fau 1 1 1 0 0 Eastern Macedonia and Thrace Rodopi NA* Xirolimni Lake, village of Fanari 40Ί 58' N 25Ί 09' E 6 Feb. 2006 fau 2 2 2 0 0 * NA: not applicable
Affected population: swans (Cygnus olor) found dead. No clinical/pathological signs were observed.
Diagnosis:
Laboratories where diagnostic tests were performed Diagnostic tests used Date Results Centre of Veterinary Institutions of Thessaloniki (national reference laboratory for avian influenza) - virus isolation in embryonated fowls eggs;
- haemagglutination test;
- haemagglutination inhibition test.
17-21 Feb. 2006 Positive for H5 C.R.L.-Weybridge, United Kingdom (OIE Reference Laboratory for avian influenza) - haemagglutination test;
- haemagglutination inhibition test;
- PCR(1);
- other preliminary tests.
22-23 Feb. 2006 Positive for H5N1 Source of outbreaks or origin of infection: unknown or inconclusive.
Control measures undertaken: the veterinary authorities have been performing an epizootiological survey and applying the measures contained in European Commission Decision 2006/115/EU since 17 February 2006 (outbreak of Fanari) and 21 February 2006 (other outbreaks), when the national reference laboratory notified positive AI results.
Treatment of affected animals: no.
Vaccination prohibited: yes.
Other details/comments:
- Outbreak in Fanari: on 6 February 2006, the veterinary authorities were informed about the presence of two dead swans in Xirolimni Lake and immediately collected the birds and sent them to the national reference laboratory (NRL).
- Outbreaks in Paralia-Katerini and Makrygialos: on 11 February 2006, the veterinary authorities were informed about the presence of two dead swans on the coast at Paralia-Katerini village and Makrygialos village and immediately collected the birds and sent them to the NRL.
- Outbreak in Stavros: on 12 February 2006, the veterinary authorities were informed about the presence of one dead swan on the coast at Stavros village and immediately collected the bird and sent it to the NRL.
- Outbreak in Epanomi: on 13 February 2006, the veterinary authorities were informed about the presence of one dead swan on the coast at Epanomi village and immediately collected the bird and sent it to the NRL.
- Outbreak in Nea Pella: on 13 February 2006, the veterinary authorities were informed about the presence of one dead swan in the area of Loudias River near Nea Pella village and immediately collected the bird and sent it to the NRL.
- Outbreak on Amoliani island: on 14 February 2006, the veterinary authorities were informed about the presence of two dead swans in the Alykes area of Amoliani island and immediately collected the birds and sent them to the NRL.
Final report: no.
*
* *MISCELLANEOUS: AVIAN INFLUENZA IN SLOVENIA (IN WILDLIFE) (Follow-up report No. 1)
See also: 6 April 2006, 9 March 2006, 23 February 2006, 16 February 2006
Information received on 24 February 2006 from Dr Simona Salamon, Deputy Director General, Veterinary Administration of the Republic of Slovenia (VARS), Ljubljana:
End of previous report period: 16 February 2006 (see Disease Information, 19 [8], 145, dated 23 February 2006).
End of this report period: 24 February 2006.
Identification of agent: highly pathogenic avian influenza virus subtype H5N1.
Date of initial detection: 11 February 2006.
New outbreaks:
First administrative division Type of epide-miolo-gical unit Name of the location Date of start of the outbreak Spe-cies Number of animals in the outbreaks susceptible cases deaths destroyed slaugh-tered Podravska region NA* - Spodnji Duplek;
- Dogoe;
- Zrkovci;
- Stare;
- Maribor.
fau 6 * NA: not applicable
Affected population: five mute swans (Cygnus olor) and one grey heron (Ardea cinerea).
All the cases were reported in the area of the river Drava.
Diagnosis:
Laboratory where diagnostic tests were performed Species examined Diagnostic tests used Date Results National Veterinary Institute Cygnus olor - RT-PCR (N and H5 genes);
- virus isolation;
- amino acid sequencing.
positive for avian influenza virus H5 Ardea cinerea - RT-PCR (N and H5 genes);
- virus isolation;
- amino acid sequencing.
positive for highly pathogenic avian influenza virus H5N1 Source of outbreaks or origin of infection: unknown or inconclusive.
Control measures:
- quarantine;
- zoning;
- movement control within the protection zone and the surveillance zone.
*
* *MISCELLANEOUS: AVIAN INFLUENZA IN CROATIA (IN WILDLIFE) (Follow-up report No. 7)
See also: 2 November 2006, 13 April 2006, 16 March 2006, 23 February 2006
Information received on 24 February 2006 from Dr Mate Brstilo, Director of the Veterinary Administration, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Zagreb:
End of previous report period: 21 February 2006 (see Disease Information, 19 [8], 151, dated 23 February 2006).
End of this report period: 23 February 2006.
Identification of agent: highly pathogenic avian influenza virus subtype H5N1.
Date of first confirmation of the event: 21 February 2006.
Date of start of the event: 15 February 2006.
Clinical disease: no.
Nature of diagnosis: laboratory.
New outbreak:
First administrative division Lower administrative division Type of epide-miolo-gical unit Name of the location Date of start of the outbreak Spe-cies Number of animals in the outbreak susceptible cases deaths destroyed slaugh-tered Splitsko-Dalmatinska Ciovo village Slatina 15 Feb. 2006 fau 1 0 1 0 0 Affected population in the new outbreak: avian influenza virus type H5N1 was isolated from organs of a dead swan found at Slatina on the island of Ciovo. Nucleotide sequencing at the cleavage site of the haemagglutinin (HA) of the H5N1 avian influenza virus isolate revealed the multiple basic amino acid sequence PQGERRRKKRGLF, which is consistent with highly pathogenic avian influenza.
Diagnosis:
Laboratory where diagnostic tests were performed Species examined Diagnostic tests used Date Results Poultry Centre of the Croatian Veterinary Institute swan - haemagglutination;
- RT-PCR.
21 Feb. 2006 - positive for H5
- positive for H5N1
- determination of haemagglutination cleavage site.
22 Feb. 2006 - positive for H5N1 Origin of infection: unknown or inconclusive; seasonal migration of wild birds (swans).
Control measures undertaken:
- control of wildlife reservoirs;
- quarantine;
- movement control inside the country;
- screening;
- zoning;
- disinfection of infected areas.
Treatment of affected animals: no.
Vaccination prohibited: yes.
Final report: no.
*
* *MISCELLANEOUS: AVIAN INFLUENZA IN SLOVAKIA (IN WILDLIFE)
(Disease never reported before in Slovakia).
Immediate notification report
Information received on 24 February 2006 from Prof. Jozef Bires, Director General, State Veterinary and Food Administration, Bratislava:
Report date: 24 February 2006.
Identification of agent: highly pathogenic avian influenza virus subtype H5N1.
Date of first confirmation of the event: 20 February 2006.
Date of start of the event: 17 February 2006.
Nature of diagnosis: laboratory.
Details of outbreaks:
First administrative division (district) Date of start of the outbreak Spe-cies Number of animals in the outbreaks susceptible cases deaths destroyed slaugh-tered Bratislava 17 Feb 2006 fau 1 1 0 0 Dunajská Streda 18 Feb 2006 fau 1 1 0 0 Description of affected population: 2 wild birds, a smew (Mergus albellus) and a peregrine falcon (Falco peregrinus).
Diagnosis:
Laboratory where diagnostic tests were performed Diagnostic tests used Date Results State Veterinary Institute, Zvolen PCR
HI
virus isolation
positive for H5N1 Veterinary Laboratory Agencies, Weybridge, United Kingdom PCR
HI
virus isolation
24 Feb. 2006 positive for H5N1 Source of outbreaks or origin of infection: unknown.
Control measures undertaken:
A. Protection zone (3-km radius):
- identification of all poultry holdings;
- biosecurity measures;
- poultry and other captive birds to be kept enclosed;
- no hatching eggs, fresh meat, minced meat, meat preparations or meat products from poultry or other captive birds (including wild feathered game) may leave the protection zone;
- no unprocessed litter or manure from holdings located in the protection zone may leave the protection zone;
- transport of poultry and other captive birds (except for non-stop transit via major roads or railways and direct transport to a slaughterhouse for immediate slaughter) is prohibited;
- markets, shows, competitions and all other gatherings of poultry and captive birds are prohibited;
- hunting of wild birds is prohibited.
B. Surveillance zone (10-km radius):
- all holdings will be identified and all poultry on those holdings will be counted and clinically inspected;
- biosecurity measures to be applied on farms, including disinfection at the entrance to the holdings (CD 205/734);
- movement of poultry and all captive birds is prohibited;
- markets, shows, competitions and all other gatherings of poultry and captive birds are prohibited;
- hunting of wild birds is prohibited.
Treatment of affected animals: no.
Final report: no.
*
* *MISCELLANEOUS: AVIAN INFLUENZA IN IRAN (IN WILDLIFE) (Follow-up report No. 1)
See also: 16 February 2006, 9 February 2006
Information received on 26 February 2006 from Dr Hossein Hassani, Head of Iran Veterinary Organization, Ministry of Jihad-e-Agriculture, Tehran:
End of previous report period: 15 February 2006 (see Disease Information, 19 [7], 120, dated 16 February 2006).
End of this report period: 25 February 2006.
A total of 41,056 backyard and village birds living within a 2-km radius of the epicentre of the two previously declared outbreaks have been culled and disposed off.
Compensation disbursal in cash was initiated in the affected areas with effect from 16 February 2006. To date, a total of 459,375,000 rials(1) has already been paid. Compensation disbursal is still in progress.
Activities related to the active surveillance system have been strengthened and all poultry farms and rural areas in the province have been inspected on a regular basis. A total of 3,245 poultry farms and 1,686 villages have been inspected thoroughly during the past week.
In addition, out of 4,889 samples taken from industrial, native and migratory birds, all samples taken from native birds and industrial poultry farms were found to be negative and the only positive samples were those from the two swans previously confirmed by the OIE/FAO(2) Reference Laboratory.
Final report: no.
(1) Approximately USD 50,315
(2) FAO: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
*
* *MISCELLANEOUS: AVIAN INFLUENZA IN SWITZERLAND (IN WILDLIFE)
See also: 15 June 2006, 8 June 2006, 1 June 2006, 25 May 2006, 18 May 2006, 11 May 2006, 4 May 2006, 27 April 2006, 13 April 2006, 6 April 2006, 16 March 2006
Immediate notification report
Information received on 27 February 2006 from Dr Hans Wyss, Director of the Federal Veterinary Office, Bern:
Report date: 26 February 2006.
Reason for immediate notification: first occurrence of a listed disease or infection in a country or zone/compartment.
Identification of agent: avian influenza virus H5.
Date of first confirmation of the event: 26 February 2006.
Date of start of the event: 26 February 2006.
Clinical disease: yes.
Nature of diagnosis: suspicion.
Details of outbreak:
First administrative division (canton) Type of epidemiological unit Name of the location Date of start of the outbreak Spe-cies Number of animals in the outbreak susceptible cases deaths destroyed slaugh-tered Geneva NA* Geneva 26 Feb. 2006 fau 1 *NA: not applicable
Diagnosis:
Laboratories where diagnosis was made Species examined Diagnostic tests used Date Results National Reference Centre for Diseases of Poultry and Rabbits, Vetsuisse Faculty Zurich, University of Zurich, Switzerland (Reference Lab) goosander
Mergus merganserRT-PCR for detection of H5 26 Feb. 2006 positive for H5 European Union reference laboratory, Weybridge, United Kingdom goosander
Mergus merganser26 Feb. 2006 pending (expected by 3 March 2006) Source of outbreak or origin of infection: unknown or inconclusive.
Control measures undertaken:
- control of wildlife reservoirs;
- movement control inside the country;
- screening;
- zoning.
Treatment of affected animals: no.
Vaccination prohibited: yes.
Other details/comments:
The outbreak was detected as part of a national monitoring programme for avian influenza in wild birds. A dead duck was found in the harbour of the city of Geneva.
Final report: no.
*
* *MISCELLANEOUS: AVIAN INFLUENZA IN HUNGARY (IN WILDLIFE)
Immediate notification report
Information received on 28 February and 1 March 2006 from Dr Tibor Bálint, Chief Veterinary Officer, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, Budapest:
Report date: 28 February and 1 March 2006.
Reason for immediate notification: first occurrence of a listed disease or infection in a country or zone/compartment.
Identification of agent: highly pathogenic avian influenza virus subtype H5N1.
Date of first confirmation of the event: 21 February 2006.
Date of start of the event: 4 February 2006.
Clinical disease: no.
Nature of diagnosis: laboratory.
Details of outbreak:
First administrative division (county) Type of epide-miolo-gical unit Name of the location Date of start of the outbreak Spe-cies Number of animals in the outbreak susceptible cases deaths destroyed slaugh-tered Bács-Kiskun village Nagybaracska 4 Feb. 2006 fau 5 5 Bács-Kiskun village Csátalja 4 Feb. 2006 fau 2 2 Description of affected population: mute swans (Cygnus olor).
Diagnosis:
Laboratories where diagnostic tests were performed Species examined Diagnostic tests used Date Results Central Veterinary Institute in Budapest swans - virus isolation
- RT-PCR
15/20/21 Feb. 2006 positive for H5 Veterinary Laboratories Agency in Weybridge - OIE Reference Laboratory swans - RT-PCR
20/27 Feb. 2006 positive for H5N1 Source of outbreak or origin of infection: contact with wild animals.
Control measures undertaken:
- control of wildlife reservoirs;
- quarantine;
- movement control inside the country;
- screening;
- zoning.
Treatment of affected animals: no.
Vaccination prohibited: yes.
Final report: no.
*
* *
http://www.oie.int/
Copyright
© 2004 OIE
World Animal Health Organisation