Disease Information

4 November 2005
Vol. 18 - No. 44

Contents
Newcastle disease in France: update on the situation as of 24 October 2005
Foot and mouth disease in Brazil: follow-up report No. 7
Foot and mouth disease in Brazil: follow-up report No. 8
Highly pathogenic avian influenza in Romania: follow-up report No. 5
Highly pathogenic avian influenza in Romania: follow-up report No. 6
Newcastle disease in Israel
High mortality observed in wild birds in Iran: final report (botulism diagnosed)
Foot and mouth disease in Botswana: follow-up report No. 2 (final report)
Newcastle disease in Slovakia
Vesicular stomatitis in the United States of America: follow-up report No. 23
American foulbrood in Chile: follow-up report No. 1
Highly pathogenic avian influenza in Thailand: follow-up report No. 75
Highly pathogenic avian influenza in China (People's Rep. of ~): follow-up report No. 5
Newcastle disease in Denmark: follow-up report No. 1

NEWCASTLE DISEASE IN FRANCE
Update on the situation as of 24 October 2005

See also: 9 November 2006, 12 October 2006, 23 December 2005, 9 December 2005, 25 November 2005, 18 November 2005, 11 November 2005, 28 October 2005, 26 August 2005, 5 August 2005, 29 July 2005, 22 July 2005

Information received on 28 October 2005 from Dr Monique Eloit, Deputy Director General, General Directorate for Food (DGAL), Ministry of Agriculture, Food, Fisheries and Rural Affairs, Paris:

End of previous report period: 21 October 2005 (see Disease Information, 18 [43], 384, dated 28 October 2005).

End of this report period: 24 October 2005.

An outbreak of Newcastle disease was confirmed on 21 October 2005, in a farm of 1,500 pheasants located in the municipality of Siracourt in the Pas de Calais département.

The outbreak concerns a pheasant farm where the initial clinical signs appeared on 20 September 2005. Each year, the farm brings in a single batch of six-week-old pheasants and raises them with a view to releasing them for hunting purposes. Because the symptoms appeared before the end of the rearing process, the establishment was placed under surveillance and all movement was prohibited. No animal has left the farm since.

After clinical signs of undetermined aetiology appeared on 20 September, the farm’s veterinarian carried out sampling to perform serological analyses on 27 September. The samples tested positive for Newcastle disease. Additional sampling on 4 October enabled the isolation, during the second embryonated egg passage, of avian paramyxovirus 1 (APMV1), pigeon variant. The intracerebral pathogenicity index (ICPI) was then found to be 1.61.

1. Chronology

DateSeries of events and tests
20 SeptemberFirst clinical signs
27 SeptemberSampling for serological testing
4 OctoberSampling for viral isolation
17 OctoberPreventive culling of all pheasants on the premises
21 OctoberPositive viral isolation during second passage. ICPI = 1.61
21 OctoberNotification to OIE and European Commission

2. Measures taken in France

2.1. The Siracourt farm was blocked and placed under surveillance as of 4 October.

2.2. Following the test by the reference laboratory identifying haemagglutinating APMV1, pigeon variant, the Siracourt farm’s 1,500 animals were preventively culled on 17 October 2005. Preliminary disinfection operations began on this date.

2.3. The five farms within a 3-km radius (protection zone) and the 28 farms within a 10-km radius (surveillance zone) of the suspect farm were placed under official control. All poultry farms in the protection zone are blocked and subject to veterinary visits. In the surveillance zone, only the ban on animal movement applies.

3. Control of intra-Community trade and exports

As concerns the movement of poultry products defined by Article 2.7.13.4. of the Terrestrial Animal Health Code, the following measures were taken in compliance with European Community regulations:

3.1. Intra-Community trade

Intra-Community trade originating in the 3-km protection zone and the 10-km surveillance zone has been suspended.

3.2. Exports to non European Union member countries

Certification has been suspended for the export of French poultry products originating in the 3-km protection zone, the 10-km surveillance zone, and, if need be, zones defined by bilateral sanitary agreements.

4. Epidemiological investigation

4.1. Possible sources of infection

Given the date of the batch’s delivery (9 July 2005) and of the appearance of clinical signs (20 September 2005), the most likely hypothesis at this time is contamination by wild animals (presence of pigeons in the surrounding area).

The epidemiological investigation is still underway.

4.2. Potential risks of spreading

The Siracourt farm is located in an area with a low farm density and without any hatchery.

Five farms were identified in the 3-km protection zone and are subject to health visits. No clinical sign of Newcastle disease has been observed.

Twenty-eight farms were identified in the 10-km surveillance zone.

Initial results from investigations conducted in the vicinity of the outbreak indicate the absence of clinical signs in neighbouring farms.

The epidemiological investigation confirmed that no animals had left the Siracourt farm since the single batch of 6.5-week-old pheasants was brought in on 9 July 2005. Moreover, the epidemiological investigation demonstrated that no unsafe poultry product originating from the Siracourt outbreak had been put on the French market, traded, or exported.

All of the farms under surveillance are blocked. Poultry products may not leave them as long as the surveillance measures remain in effect. All necessary protection measures have been put in place, including the preventive culling of all birds located in the outbreak zone as of 17 October 2005.

*
* *

FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE IN BRAZIL
Follow-up report No. 7

See also: 26 October 2006, 14 September 2006, 27 July 2006, 22 June 2006, 1 June 2006, 25 May 2006, 27 April 2006, 20 April 2006, 6 April 2006, 16 March 2006, 23 February 2006, 2 February 2006, 19 January 2006, 12 January 2006, 23 December 2005, 9 December 2005, 2 December 2005, 18 November 2005, 18 November 2005, 4 November 2005, 28 October 2005, 28 October 2005, 28 October 2005, 21 October 2005, 21 October 2005, 14 October 2005, 14 October 2005

Translation of information received on 29 October 2005 from Dr Jorge Caetano Junior, Director, Department of Animal Protection (DDA), Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Food Supply, Brasilia:

End of previous report period: 25 October 2005 (see Disease Information, 18 [43], 392, dated 28 October 2005).

End of this report period: 28 October 2005.

Precise identification of agent: foot and mouth disease (FMD) virus serotype O.

Date of first confirmation of the event: 8 October 2005.

Date of start of the event: 26 September 2005.

Nature of diagnosis: clinical and laboratory.

Surveillance activities in the five quarantined municipalities in the State of Mato Grosso do Sul have led to the detection of 10 new outbreaks of foot and mouth disease (FMD), diagnosed on the basis of clinical and epidemiological observations.

Details of new outbreaks:

First administrative division (State)Lower administrative division (municipality)Type of epidemiological unitLatitudeLongitudeDate of start of the outbreakSpeciesNumber of animals in the outbreaks
susceptiblecasesdeathsdestroyedslaugh-tered
Mato Grosso do SulEldoradofarm23 47’05.2” S54 22’58.5” W24 Oct. 2005bov4310…0
Mato Grosso do SulJaporãfarm23 52’13.5” S54 32’36.3” W17 Oct. 2005bov820…0
Mato Grosso do SulJaporãfarm23 52’05.3” S54 32’17.4” W20 Oct. 2005bov1,113320…0
Mato Grosso do SulJaporãfarm23 51’15.8” S54 32’02.9” W21 Oct. 2005bov2220…0
Mato Grosso do SulJaporãfarm23Ί50’43.4” S54 31’02.4” W21 Oct. 2005bov3490…0
Mato Grosso do SulJaporãfarm23 50’19.3” S54 32’24.1” W21 Oct. 2005bov1910…0
Mato Grosso do SulJaporãfarm23 52’44.6” S54 24’53.0” W24 Oct. 2005bov2620…0
sui1900…0
Mato Grosso do SulJaporãfarm23 50’26.0” S54 32’28.4” W26 Oct. 2005bov1610…0
Mato Grosso do SulJaporãfarm23 51’14.3” S54 28’12.6” W27 Oct. 2005bov3010…0
Mato Grosso do SulMundo Novofarm23 49’38.8” S54 23’05.8” W19 Oct. 2005bov57620…0

Description of affected population: fattening cattle. There have been no reports of suspected cases in species other than bovines.

The eight new outbreaks in Japorã municipality are all in close proximity to the four outbreaks previously notified in this district(1); seven of the new outbreaks are in small farms in a settlement comprising many small rural properties situated very close to one another and using the same methods of production and feeding for their small herds.

The outbreak in Mundo Novo municipality occurred in a large farm with fattening cattle situated not far from Japorã municipality.

The outbreak in Eldorado municipality occurred in a small farm situated very close to an outbreak previously notified in this municipality(2).

Source of outbreak: unknown or inconclusive (investigations in progress).

Control measures:

- Stamping out (in progress). To date, 1,612 cattle, 190 sheep and 49 pigs have been culled. Heavy rainfall, a regular occurrence in the region at this time of year, is hampering the culling and destruction of animals in the outbreaks.

- Disinfection of infected premises.

- The municipalities of Eldorado, Iguatemi, Itaquiraí, Japorã and Mundo Novo remain under quarantine. Twenty-five checkpoints were set up to prevent any movement of FMD-susceptible animals or their products/by-products originating from these districts to national or international markets.

- To date, 1,277 holdings comprising a total of 130,093 cattle, 2,888 sheep and goats and 3,202 pigs have been inspected in the zone where a movement ban is in force.

- The 25-km-radius safety zone around the new outbreaks lies completely within the boundary of the aforementioned five municipalities.

The control measures in the region involve the use of material and human resources from the State and Federal governments, with assistance from the law enforcement services at fixed checkpoints and mobile teams.

Other details/comments:

Five new suspected outbreaks of vesicular disease have been detected in the State of Paraná, all in farms adjoining the four properties previously reported in the municipalities of Amaporã, Loanda, Maringá and Grandes Rios(3). In this region, 211 properties have been inspected and no animals with a suspected vesicular disease have been discovered, apart from the nine suspected outbreaks reported to date.

Final report: no.

(1) See Follow-up report No. 3 and Follow-up report No. 4

(2) See Follow-up report No. 6

(3) See Follow-up report No. 5

*
* *

FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE IN BRAZIL
Follow-up report No. 8

See also: 26 October 2006, 14 September 2006, 27 July 2006, 22 June 2006, 1 June 2006, 25 May 2006, 27 April 2006, 20 April 2006, 6 April 2006, 16 March 2006, 23 February 2006, 2 February 2006, 19 January 2006, 12 January 2006, 23 December 2005, 9 December 2005, 2 December 2005, 18 November 2005, 18 November 2005, 4 November 2005, 28 October 2005, 28 October 2005, 28 October 2005, 21 October 2005, 21 October 2005, 14 October 2005, 14 October 2005

Translation of information received on 4 November 2005 from Dr Jorge Caetano Junior, Director, Department of Animal Protection (DDA), Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Food Supply, Brasilia:

End of previous report period: 28 October 2005 (see Disease Information, 18 [44], 401, dated 4 November 2005).

End of this report period: 3 November 2005.

Precise identification of agent: foot and mouth disease (FMD) virus serotype O.

Date of first confirmation of the event: 8 October 2005.

Date of start of the event: 26 September 2005.

Nature of diagnosis: clinical and laboratory.

Details of new outbreak:

First administrative division (State)Lower administrative division (municipality)Type of epidemiological unitLatitudeLongitudeDate of start of the outbreakSpeciesNumber of animals in the outbreak
susceptiblecasesdeathsdes-troyedslaugh-tered
Mato Grosso do SulJaporãfarm23 45’50.1” S54 40’19.5” W31 Oct. 2005bov5,385420…0
ovi2700…0

MAP

Description of affected population in the new outbreak: breeding and fattening cattle, all male, aged between 24 and 36 months. There have been no suspected clinical cases among the sheep present in the outbreak.

Source of new outbreak: unknown or inconclusive.

Control measures

A. Undertaken:

- quarantine;

- movement control inside the country;

- screening;

- zoning.

B. To be undertaken:

- stamping out;

- disinfection of infected premises/establishment(s).

Treatment of affected animals: no.

Other details/comments:

- Surveillance activities in the State of Mato Grosso do Sul have led to the detection of a new outbreak, diagnosed on clinical and epidemiological grounds, in Japorã municipality. The owner of the affected farm notified the official Veterinary Service of the outbreak on 1 November 2005 and the farm was immediately placed under quarantine. The farm has 5,385 fattening cattle and 27 sheep. Forty-two cattle aged between 24 and 36 months showed clinical signs of a vesicular disease. Samples have been sent to LANAGRO-PA(1) for laboratory confirmation.

Movement restriction measures are still in force in the municipalities of Eldorado, Iguatemi, Itaquiraí, Japorã and Mundo Novo, prohibiting any movement of FMD-susceptible animals or their products or by-products originating from these districts to national or international markets.

Culling and destruction of the animals in the outbreak is in progress. So far, 2,547 animals (2,308 cattle, 190 sheep and 49 pigs) have been slaughtered.

To date, in the State of Mato Grosso do Sul, 1,277 farms, with a total of 130,635 cattle, 3,230 sheep and goats and 3,255 pigs, have been inspected, throughout the quarantine zone. There have been no suspected cases in species other than bovines.

Control operations carried out in the region involve the use of material and human resources provided by the State and Federal governments, with law enforcement services manning mobile teams and fixed checkpoints, including five checkpoints on the international border.

Meetings are being organised with livestock producers in the affected areas and public awareness is being raised throughout the region.

- In the State of Paraná, there are still nine suspected outbreaks in four different municipalities (two suspected outbreaks in Maringá, one in Grandes Rios, four in Loanda and two in Amaporã)(2).

To date, 150 properties within a 3-km radius of the suspect farms, and 464 properties within a 10-km radius, have been visited.

Properties with animals that were obtained from the auction sales in Londrina (Paraná) are still under surveillance, but no animal has shown clinical signs of a vesicular disease other than in the nine suspect properties. The results of the laboratory diagnostic tests are still awaited.

Final report: no.

(1) LANAGRO-PA: National Agricultural Defence Laboratory, Belém, Pará

(2) See Follow-up report No. 5

*
* *

HIGHLY PATHOGENIC AVIAN INFLUENZA IN ROMANIA
Follow-up report No. 5

See also: 2 March 2006, 23 February 2006, 16 February 2006, 19 January 2006, 5 January 2006, 30 December 2005, 23 December 2005, 16 December 2005, 9 December 2005, 2 December 2005, 2 December 2005, 25 November 2005, 18 November 2005, 4 November 2005, 28 October 2005, 21 October 2005, 21 October 2005, 14 October 2005, 14 October 2005

Information received on 31 October 2005 from Dr Gabriel Predoi, Director General, National Sanitary Veterinary and Food Safety Authority, Bucharest:

End of previous report period: 22 October 2005 (see Disease Information, 18 [43], 386, dated 28 October 2005).

End of this report period: 31 October 2005.

The avian influenza virus detected in a heron, found dead in Vaslui County on 21 October 2005, was confirmed to be of H5N1 subtype.

Conventional amino acid sequencing has revealed a motif of PQGERRRKKRGLF, a sequence consistent with high pathogenicity, and the same cleavage site sequence as in the Novosibirsk (Russia), Qinghai (People's Republic of China), Turkey and previous Romanian isolates.

Preliminary phylogenetic analysis (approx. 300 bp) places the Romanian isolate in the same grouping as the above viruses, with the closest matches being 100% with the chicken Romania Av 1210/05 and also the Turkey virus.

Final report: no.

*
* *

HIGHLY PATHOGENIC AVIAN INFLUENZA IN ROMANIA
Follow-up report No. 6

See also: 2 March 2006, 23 February 2006, 16 February 2006, 19 January 2006, 5 January 2006, 30 December 2005, 23 December 2005, 16 December 2005, 9 December 2005, 2 December 2005, 2 December 2005, 25 November 2005, 18 November 2005, 4 November 2005, 28 October 2005, 21 October 2005, 21 October 2005, 14 October 2005, 14 October 2005

Information received on 1 November 2005 from Dr Gabriel Predoi, Director General, National Sanitary Veterinary and Food Safety Authority, Bucharest:

End of previous report period: 31 October 2005 (see Disease Information, 18 [44], 405, dated 4 November 2005).

End of this report period: 1 November 2005.

Date of first confirmation of the event: 7 October 2005.

Date of start of the event: 4 October 2005.

Nature of diagnosis: laboratory.

Details of new outbreak:

First administrative division (County)Lower administrative division (district)Type of epidemiological unitName of the locationDate of start of the outbreakSpeciesNumber of animals in the outbreak
susceptiblecasesdeathsdestroyedslaugh-tered
ConstantaMihai ViteazuvillageRiver Danube, in the vicinity of Vadu-Oii village10 Oct. 2005fau…3*3……

* 2 geese and 1 swan

Description of affected population in the new outbreak: the birds were found dead in an unpopulated area, at a distance of about 1 km from the River Danube, close to Vadu-Oii locality; the birds may have belonged to a flock of migratory birds.

Diagnosis:

Laboratory where diagnostic tests were performedDiagnostic tests usedDateResults
Institute for Diagnostics and Animal Health (national reference laboratory for avian influenza)virus isolation; genomic detection1 Nov. 2005positive for virus subtype H5

Source of new outbreak: unknown or inconclusive.

Treatment of affected animals: no.

Final report: no.

*
* *

NEWCASTLE DISEASE IN ISRAEL

See also: 28 October 2005, 28 October 2005, 14 October 2005, 16 September 2005, 2 September 2005, 12 August 2005, 29 July 2005

(Date of previous outbreak of Newcastle disease in Israel reported to the OIE: October 2005).

Immediate notification report

Information received on 31 October 2005 from Dr Moshe Chaimovitz, Director of Veterinary and Animal Health Services, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, Beit-Dagan:

Report date: 31 October 2005.

Reason for immediate notification: re-occurrence of a listed disease in a zone following a report declaring the outbreaks ended.

Date of first confirmation of the event: 27 October 2005.

Date of start of the event: 25 October 2005.

Nature of diagnosis: clinical, post-mortem and laboratory.

Details of outbreak:

First administrative divisionLower administrative divisionType of epidemiological unitName of the locationDate of start of the outbreakSpeciesNumber of animals in the outbreak
susceptiblecasesdeathsdestroyedslaugh-tered
HaDaromBeer-ShevavillageHura25 Oct. 2005avi500-800*……3000

* The total population was estimated to be between 500 and 800 unvaccinated chickens.

Description of affected population: the outbreak occurred in multiple backyard chicken flocks. There were about twenty chickens in each holding.

Diagnosis:

Laboratories where diagnostic tests were performedDiagnostic tests usedDateResults
Kimron Veterinary Institutepolymerase chain reaction (PCR) on swabs27 Oct. 2005positive
intracerebral pathogenicity index (ICPI) testin progresspending
Beer-Tuvia regional poultry disease laboratorypathogen isolation by egg inoculation28 Oct. 2005positive

Source of outbreak or origin of infection: unknown or inconclusive.

Control measures undertaken:

- stamping out (the chicken population was destroyed on 28 October 2005);

- movement control inside the country;

- screening;

- vaccination;

- disinfection of infected premises.

Vaccination in response to the outbreak:

SpeciesTotal number of animals vaccinatedDetails of the vaccine
poultryall flocks within a radius of 10 kmlive virus vaccine (VH strain) by spray; ICPI 0.15

In Israel, vaccination against Newcastle disease is compulsory. Orders were issued to all owners of poultry and other avian species within a radius of 10 km to perform an immediate booster vaccination.

Other details/comments: there are no commercial poultry flocks within a radius of 3 km around the outbreak.

Final report: no.

*
* *

HIGH MORTALITY OBSERVED IN WILD BIRDS IN IRAN
FINAL REPORT (BOTULISM DIAGNOSED)

See also: 14 October 2005

Information received on 1 November 2005 from Dr Hassani, Head of Iran Veterinary Organization, Ministry of Jihad-e-Agriculture, Tehran:

End of previous report period: 12 October 2005 (see Disease Information, 18 [41], 351, dated 14 October 2005).

End of this report period: 31 October 2005.

Date of start of the event: 2 October 2005.

Details of outbreak (updated data):

First administrative division (province)Lower administrative divisionType of epidemiological unitName of the locationSpeciesNumber of animals in the outbreak
susceptiblecasesdeathsdestroyedslaugh-tered
West AzerbaijanPoldasht…Aras River (bordering Nakhjavan)fau……3,68300

Description of affected population: wild waterfowl (wild ducks).

Diagnosis: no post-mortem lesions are seen in dead birds. Sick birds show weakness and paralysis in the neck and wings.

The tests that were done for avian influenza virus subtypes H5, H7 and H9 gave negative results(1). Negative results were also obtained with the tests for Newcastle disease (haemagglutination test), duck virus enteritis (RT-PCR(2)) and pasteurellosis.

However, positive results were obtained on 30 October 2005 with a specific bioassay for botulism.

Samples are being sent, this week, to the OIE Reference Laboratory for highly pathogenic avian influenza in Padova, Italy.

Source of outbreak or origin of infection: unknown or inconclusive.

Control measures undertaken:

- quarantine;

- movement control inside the country;

- screening;

- zoning;

- disinfection of infected areas.

Treatment of affected animals: no.

Final report: yes.

(1) See Immediate notification report

(2) RT-PCR: reverse transcriptase - polymerase chain reaction

*
* *

FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE IN BOTSWANA
Follow-up report No. 2 (final report)

See also: 9 November 2006, 9 November 2006, 10 August 2006, 10 August 2006, 13 July 2006, 13 July 2006, 22 June 2006, 8 June 2006, 18 May 2006, 11 May 2006, 27 April 2006, 9 September 2005, 19 August 2005

Information received on 2 November 2005 from Dr Musa Fanikiso, Director of Animal Health and Production, Ministry of Agriculture, Gaborone:

End of previous report period: 5 September 2005 (see Disease Information, 18 [36], 297, dated 9 September 2005).

End of this report period: 2 November 2005.

Precise identification of agent: foot and mouth disease (FMD) virus serotype SAT2.

Date of first confirmation of the event: 11 August 2005.

Date of start of the event: 28 July 2005.

The outbreak of foot and mouth disease (FMD) in cattle in Pandamatenga extension area has been controlled. The outbreak was successfully contained within the infected area and the majority of animals that were affected have recovered (i.e. lesions healed).

Description of affected population:

The population dynamics remain as in the last report, i.e. Pandamatenga extension area has about 1,300 cattle of which 800 are in the communal area and 500 in fenced farms. Extensive surveillance has shown that the disease is restricted only to communal herds, with almost all holdings/kraals affected; however lesions have now healed.

There is no disease in the fenced farms and other areas of Kasane district, which has a total of 16,000 cattle.

The disease has affected no other species except cattle.

Diagnosis (updated information):

Laboratories where diagnostic tests were performedSpecies examinedDiagnostic tests usedDateResults
Botswana Vaccine Institutebov

- solid-phase blocking ELISA(1);

- virus isolation.

2 Sept. 2005positive for virus type SAT2
Pirbright Laboratory (United Kingdom) (OIE Reference Laboratory for FMD)bovvirus isolation2 Sept. 2005positive for virus type SAT2

Control measures:

- The control measures described in the previous reports remain in force, i.e. blockade; disinfection; ban on the movement of live animals, their fresh products and most products of cloven-hoofed animal origin; and public education/awareness campaigns.

- Intensive surveillance continues in the form of daily visual inspections and fortnightly physical inspections. Some animals are expected to become carriers and sampling and testing of oesophago-pharyngeal samples will therefore commence soon.

- The vaccination strategy has not changed. Cattle in the district are due for the normal third leg vaccination against the disease in December 2005.

Final report: yes.

(1) ELISA: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

*
* *

NEWCASTLE DISEASE IN SLOVAKIA

See also: 9 December 2005

(Date of previous outbreak of Newcastle disease in Slovakia reported to the OIE: 1980).

Immediate notification report

Information received on 2 November 2005 from Prof. Jozef Bíres, Director General, State Veterinary and Food Administration (SVFA), Bratislava:

Report date: 2 November 2005.

Reason for immediate notification: re-occurrence of a listed disease in a country.

Precise identification of agent: avian paramyxovirus 1 (APMV1), pigeon variant.

Date of first confirmation of the event: 26 October 2005.

Date of start of the event: 5 October 2005.

Nature of diagnosis: clinical and laboratory.

Details of outbreak:

First administrative divisionLower administrative divisionType of epidemiological unitName of the locationSpeciesNumber of animals in the outbreak
susceptiblecasesdeathsdestroyedslaugh-tered
ŽilinaŽilinavillageLietavská Lúckaavi150*1401500

* pigeons

Diagnosis:

Laboratory where diagnostic tests were performedDiagnostic tests usedDateResults
State Veterinary Laboratory, Zvolen (national reference laboratory)

- virus isolation in chicken embryos;

- haemagglutination inhibition test.

26 Oct. 2005positive
sequencing26 Oct. 2005amino acid sequence on cleavage site: 111-Gly-Arg- Arg-Lys-Lys-Arg-Phe-119

Source of outbreak or origin of infection: probably contact with town pigeons.

Control measures: in accordance with European Union legislation:

- within the zones, poultry cannot be moved without permission from SVFA;

- stamping out;

- cleaning and disinfection.

Vaccination prohibited: no.

Final report: no.

*
* *

VESICULAR STOMATITIS IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Follow-up report No. 23

See also: 28 December 2006, 7 December 2006, 23 November 2006, 16 November 2006, 2 November 2006, 26 October 2006, 19 October 2006, 12 October 2006, 5 October 2006, 28 September 2006, 21 September 2006, 14 September 2006, 7 September 2006, 31 August 2006, 24 August 2006, 13 April 2006, 16 February 2006, 26 January 2006, 12 January 2006, 23 December 2005, 9 December 2005, 18 November 2005, 28 October 2005, 21 October 2005, 14 October 2005, 7 October 2005, 30 September 2005, 23 September 2005, 16 September 2005, 2 September 2005, 26 August 2005, 19 August 2005, 5 August 2005, 29 July 2005, 15 July 2005, 8 July 2005

Information received on 2 November 2005 from Dr Peter Fernandez, Associate Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Washington, DC:

End of previous report period: 23 October 2005 (see Disease Information, 18 [43], 393, dated 28 October 2005).

End of this report period: 30 October 2005.

Precise identification of agent: vesicular stomatitis virus type New Jersey.

Date of first confirmation of the event: 27 April 2005.

Date of start of the event: 16 April 2005.

New outbreaks:

First administrative division (State)Lower administrative division (County)Type of epidemiological unitName of the locationDate of start of the outbreakSpeciesNumber of animals in the outbreaks
susceptiblecasesdeathsdestroyedslaugh-tered
ColoradoDeltafarmCrawford17 Oct 2005bov312000
equ60000
ColoradoMesafarmGrand Junction28 Oct 2005equ41000
NebraskaScotts BlufffarmLyman12 Oct 2005bov161000
ovi2510000
UtahBox ElderfarmPark Valley20 Oct 2005equ147000
bov30000
UtahDuchesnefarmBluebell18 Oct 2005equ91000
sui120000
WyomingBig HornfarmBurlington16 Oct 2005equ582000
WyomingCarbonfarmEncampment13 Oct 2005bov3505000
WyomingSweetwaterfarmMcKinnen12 Oct 2005bov1203000

Diagnosis:

Laboratories where diagnosis was madeSpecies examinedDiagnostic tests usedDatesResults
National Veterinary Services Laboratories, Ames, Iowaequcomplement fixation test28 October 2005positive
Foreign Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory, Plum Island, New Yorkbovcomplement fixation test28 October 2005positive
virus isolation28 October 2005positive (virus type New Jersey)

Source of outbreaks or origin of infection: unknown or inconclusive (vectors?).

Control measures undertaken:

- control of arthropods;

- quarantine;

- on-going surveillance activities are being performed by APHIS Veterinary Services and Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico, Texas, Utah and Wyoming State Departments of Agriculture personnel.

Treatment of affected animals: no.

Vaccination prohibited: yes.

Other details/comments:

- On 27 June 2005, the State of Texas released the quarantine of the one vesicular stomatitis premises in the State(1).

- On 17 August 2005, the State of Arizona released the quarantine on the last vesicular stomatitis premises in the State(1).

- On 18 October 2005, the State of New Mexico released the quarantine on the last two vesicular stomatitis premises in the State(1).

Final report: no.

(1) Note: no new vesicular stomatitis-positive premises have been reported in Texas since May 2005, in Arizona since June 2005 and in New Mexico since August 2005.

*
* *

AMERICAN FOULBROOD IN CHILE
Follow-up report No. 1

See also: 30 March 2006, 2 March 2006, 26 January 2006, 12 January 2006, 23 December 2005, 16 December 2005, 9 December 2005, 2 December 2005, 25 November 2005, 18 November 2005, 28 October 2005

Translation of information received on 2 November 2005 from Dr Hernan Rojas Olavarria, Head, Department of Animal Protection, Department of Agriculture and Animal Production (SAG), Ministry of Agriculture, Santiago:

End of previous report period: 21 October 2005 (see Disease Information, 18 [43], 387, dated 28 October 2005).

End of this report period: 2 November 2005.

Precise identification of agent: Paenibacillus larvae subsp. larvae.

Date of first confirmation of the event: 20 October 2005.

Date of start of the event: 15 October 2005.

Nature of diagnosis: clinical and laboratory.

Details of new outbreaks:

First administrative divisionLower administrative divisionsType of epide-miologi-cal unitName of the location (sector)LatitudeLongitudeDate of start of the outbreakEs-pe-cieNumber of animals in the outbreaks
susce-ptiblecasesdeathsdes-troyedslaugh-tered
V RegionPutaendoapiaryCasablanca32 31΄55.1069”S70 39΄1.9727”W19 Oct. 2005api54*50…0
PutaendoapiaryEl Tártaro32 33΄57.9048”S70 43΄4.3929”W19 Oct. 2005api60*30…0
PutaendoapiaryPutaendo32 38΄37.4408”S70 43΄10.4230” W19 Oct. 2005api6*10…0
PutaendoapiaryQuebrada Herrera32 41΄42.5204”S70 44΄52.9568” W20 Oct. 2005api250*50…0
VII RegionCuricó, Rauco districtapiaryEl Parrón35 6΄5.2708”S71 23΄26.9982”W20 Oct. 2005api48*60…0

* hives

Diagnosis:

Laboratory where diagnostic tests were performedDiagnostic tests usedDateResults
Department of Laboratories and Plant and Animal Quarantine Stations, Lo Aguirre, Santiago de Chile (official SAG laboratory)PCR(1)2 Nov. 2005positive

Source of new outbreaks: contact and neighbourhood with affected hives.

Control measures

A. Undertaken:

- quarantine;

- movement control inside the country.

B. To be undertaken:

- partial stamping out;

- zoning.

Other details/comments:

The following measures were applied in the outbreaks:

- investigations into the origin of the outbreaks;

- delineation of focal zones and perifocal zones;

- identification of apiaries located in the focal and perifocal zones;

- sampling in apiaries located in the focal zone;

- inspection of apiaries considered as contacts;

- destruction of affected hives;

- quarantine of affected apiaries;

- investigations into possible links with other regions in the country;

- preparation of a manual of proceedings;

- dissemination of information via the media and Internet;

- establishment of a public/private sector committee.

Final report: no.

(1) PCR: polymerase chain reaction

*
* *

HIGHLY PATHOGENIC AVIAN INFLUENZA IN THAILAND
Follow-up report No. 75

See also: 16 November 2006, 3 August 2006, 27 July 2006, 6 April 2006, 16 February 2006, 2 February 2006, 26 January 2006, 19 January 2006, 12 January 2006, 23 December 2005, 16 December 2005, 9 December 2005, 2 December 2005, 25 November 2005, 18 November 2005, 28 October 2005, 21 October 2005, 14 October 2005, 7 October 2005, 30 September 2005, 23 September 2005, 16 September 2005, 9 September 2005, 2 September 2005, 26 August 2005, 19 August 2005, 12 August 2005, 29 July 2005, 22 July 2005, 15 July 2005

Information received on 28 October and 4 November 2005 from Dr Yukol Limlamthong, Director General, Department of Livestock Development (DLD), Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives, Bangkok:

End of previous report period: 25 October 2005 (see Disease Information, 18 [43], 394, dated 28 October 2005).

End of this report period: 3 November 2005.

Date of first confirmation of the event: 23 January 2004.

Nature of diagnosis: clinical, post-mortem and laboratory.

Details of new outbreaks:

First administrative division (province)Lower administrative divisionsType of epidemiological unitName of the locationDate of start of the outbreakSpeciesNumber of animals in the outbreaks
susceptiblecasesdeathsdestroyedslaugh-tered
AngThongThewarat, Chaiyovillagevillage No. 128 Oct. 2005avi70696910
AngThongThewarat, Chaiyovillagevillage No. 428 Oct. 2005avi13613513510
KalasinHuaiMek, HuaiMekvillagevillage No. 1027 Oct. 2005avi93360
KalasinKongKam, YangTaLadvillagevillage No. 1625 Oct. 2005avi94450
SuphanBuriBanDon, U Thongvillagevillage No. 126 Oct. 2005avi4,5001,2851,2853,2150
SuphanBuriChoraKheSamPhan, U Thongvillagevillage No. 227 Oct. 2005avi401010300
SuphanBuriNongPhakNak, SamChukvillagevillage No. 127 Oct. 2005avi1111100
SuphanBuriNongSaDao, SamChukvillagevillage No. 627 Oct. 2005avi2,0004084081,5920

Description of affected population in the new outbreaks:

- Outbreaks in the provinces of AngThong and Kalasin: native chickens.

- Outbreaks in SuphanBuri province: laying hens, fighting cocks, Thai traditionally raised ducks.

Diagnosis:

Laboratory where diagnosis was madeDiagnostic tests usedResults
National Institute of Animal Health and Regional Veterinary Research and Development Centres, DLD

- agar-gel precipitation test;

- haemagglutination test;

- pathogen isolation by egg inoculation;

- intracerebral pathogenicity index test.

positive

Source of new outbreaks: unknown or inconclusive.

Control measures undertaken:

- stamping out;

- quarantine;

- movement control inside the country;

- screening;

- zoning;

- disinfection of infected premises/establishments.

Vaccination prohibited: yes.

Other details/comments:

Thailand has been conducting the current nationwide surveillance since 1 July 2005.

In this third wave to date, there have been 72 confirmed outbreaks in ten provinces, since the second wave of HPAI re-occurrence that occurred from 3 July 2004 to 12 April 2005:

Affected provinceNo. of outbreaks
AngThong2
Ayudhaya1
Chainat1
Kalasin2
KamphaengPhet25
KanchanaBuri6
NakhonPathom4
NonthaBuri2
Saraburi5
SuphanBuri24

Nine of the ten affected provinces are in the Central Poultry Zone of Thailand (see details and map in Disease Information, 18 [35], 290-291, dated 2 September 2005). The other affected province, Kalasin, is in the North-Eastern Zone.

All cases involved either free-range poultry or poultry raised in farms with traditional husbandry practices with poor sanitation and insufficient biosecurity.

Affected populationNo. of outbreaks
native poultry52
quail6
fighting cocks5
broilers4
ducks3
laying hens2

Final report: no.

*
* *

HIGHLY PATHOGENIC AVIAN INFLUENZA IN CHINA (PEOPLE'S REP. OF ~)
Follow-up report No. 5

See also: 5 October 2006, 17 August 2006, 27 July 2006, 6 July 2006, 22 June 2006, 8 June 2006, 9 February 2006, 12 January 2006, 5 January 2006, 16 December 2005, 2 December 2005, 25 November 2005, 18 November 2005, 11 November 2005, 11 November 2005, 28 October 2005, 21 October 2005, 12 August 2005

Information received on 3 November 2005 from Mr Jia Youling, Director General, Veterinary Bureau, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing:

End of previous report period: 25 October 2005 (see Disease Information, 18 [43], 388, dated 28 October 2005).

End of this report period: 3 November 2005.

Precise identification of agent: highly pathogenic avian influenza virus subtype H5N1.

Date of first confirmation of the event: 7 June 2005.

Nature of diagnosis: clinical, post-mortem and laboratory.

Details of new outbreaks:

First administrative divisionLower administrative divisionType of epidemiological unitName of the locationDate of start of the outbreakSpeciesNumber of animals in the outbreaks
susceptiblecasesdeathsdestroyedslaugh-tered
Liaoning provinceJinzhou municipalityvillageBadaohao26 Oct. 2005avi82,0008,9408,940*73,0600
fau……20**…0

* chickens

** magpies and other wild birds

Diagnosis:

On 26 October 2005, a number of deaths occurred among chickens raised by farmers in Badaohao, Heishan county, Liaoning province. At first, local veterinarians suspected Newcastle disease and reported the event to the Liaoning Animal Health Supervision Management Bureau. On 1 November, the veterinarians of the Bureau primarily diagnosed it as suspected highly pathogenic avian influenza, which was later laboratory confirmed.

Laboratory where diagnostic tests were performedDiagnostic tests usedDateResults
Harbin Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin (national reference laboratory for avian influenza)

- haemagglutination inhibition test;

- RT-PCR(1).

3 November 2005positive
intravenous pathogenicity index (IVPI) test3 November 2005positive (highly pathogenic)

Source of new outbreak: contact with wild birds.

Control measures undertaken:

- killing and destruction of all birds remaining in the outbreak (73,060) and 296,840 birds in the area around the outbreak;

- quarantine;

- movement control inside the country;

- screening;

- zoning;

- vaccination;

- disinfection of infected premises/establishments;

- dipping/spraying.

Vaccination in response to the outbreaks:

First administrative divisionTotal number of birds vaccinatedDetails of the vaccine
Liaoning province13,900,000monovalent inactivated vaccine against subtype H5N2

Final report: no.

(1) RT-PCR: reverse transcriptase - polymerase chain reaction

*
* *

NEWCASTLE DISEASE IN DENMARK
Follow-up report No. 1

See also: 27 April 2006, 23 December 2005, 2 December 2005, 28 October 2005

Information received on 4 November 2005 from Dr Preben Willeberg, Chief Veterinary Officer, Danish Veterinary and Food Administration (DVFA), Søborg:

End of previous report period: 21 October 2005 (see Disease Information, 18 [43], 383, dated 28 October 2005).

End of this report period: 4 November 2005.

Date of first confirmation of the event: 21 October 2005.

Date of start of the event: 14 October 2005.

There have been no new outbreaks of Newcastle disease since the outbreak that was reported in the immediate notification report on 21 October 2005.

Diagnosis (additional information):

Laboratory where diagnostic tests were performedDiagnostic tests usedDateResults
Danish Institute for Food and Veterinary ResearchIntracerebral pathogenicity index (ICPI) test28 Oct. 2005ICPI = 1.79

Other details/comments:

- Based on the results of the sequencing analyses obtained on 21 October 2005, the Danish Veterinary and Food Administration (DVFA) decided to cull the affected flock and establish protection and surveillance zones around it. The culling of the flock was completed on 24 October 2005. The preliminary cleaning and disinfection of the establishment was approved by DVFA on 4 November 2005.

- Six farms have been examined for Newcastle disease because they had received day-old chicks from the infected establishment within the last month. The results of these investigations showed no evidence (either clinical or laboratory) that the disease had spread to these farms, and the restrictions on all six farms have been lifted.

Final report: no.

*
* *


top.gif (857 octets) [top]

http://www.oie.int/

Copyright © 2004 OIE
World Animal Health Organisation